Ohio Voters to decide on Abortion Access in Upcoming November Ballot

Ohio voters will have the opportunity this fall to decide whether to guarantee access to abortion in the state setting up a volatile fight rife with emotional messaging and competing factual claims reported APState officials said Tuesday that a ballot measure to change the state constitution had enough signatures It would establish a fundamental right to reproductive freedom with reasonable limits In language similar to a constitutional amendment that Michigan voters approved last November it would require restrictions imposed past a fetus viability outside the womb which is typically around the 24th week of pregnancy and was the standard under Roe v Wade to be based on evidence of patient health and safety benefitsEvery person deserves respect dignity and the right to make reproductive health care decisions including those related to their own pregnancy miscarriage care and abortion free from government interference Lauren Blauvelt and Dr Lauren Beene executive committee members for Ohioans United for Reproductive Rights said in a statementRepublican Secretary of State Frank LaRose determined that Ohioans United for Reproductive Rights submitted nearly 496000 valid signatures more than the 413446 needed to put the question before voters on Nov 7 The coalition submitted more than 700000 signatures in totalIt remains to be seen what percentage of the Ohio electorate needs to support the amendment for it to pass That will depend on the outcome of an Aug 8 special election called by Statehouse Republicans to determine whether to raise the threshold for passing future constitutional changes from a simple majority in place since 1912 to a 6037 supermajority AP VoteCast polling last year found 5937 of Ohio voters say abortion should generally be legalThe August ballot measure also would eliminate the 10day curing period when citizenled campaigns may submit additional signatures if they fall short the first time and increase the number of counties where signatures must be collected from 44 to all 88 But those provisions would come too late to impact the abortion issue which has already faced both legal and administrative hurdles to now be poised for a voteAbortion remains legal in the state up to 20 weeks gestation under a judges order issued in a lawsuit challenging a ban once cardiac activity can be detected or around six weeks into pregnancy which is before many women even know they are pregnant The Republican attorney general has asked the Ohio Supreme Court to overturn the stayOhios antiabortion network has signaled it is ready to fight the November proposal vowing a vehement and wellfunded opposition campaign Opponents of the measure have advanced an argument that because the amendment protects individuals it has the potential to trump Ohios parental consent laws around abortion The proposals authors reject that legal theory Opponents have also suggested in advertisements that the measure would open the door to gender transitioning surgeries for all ages matching national political messaging that experts deem misleadingAmy Natoce press secretary for Protect Ohio Women the official opposition campaign said the group will continue to shine a light on the ACLUs disastrous agenda until it is defeated in November The American Civil Liberties Union of Ohio is on the November campaigns executive committee and serves as part of Ohioans United For Reproductive Rights legal teamOhioans are waking up to the dangers of the ACLUs antiparent amendment and they are terrified and rightfully so she said in a statementThe proposal joins others around the nation that have been motivated by last summers US Supreme Court decision to overturn Roe v Wade and the nationwide right to abortion it once protected leaving abortion policy to individual statesIn the first statewide test following that decision Kansas voters resoundingly protected abortion rights last August In November five other states California Kentucky Michigan Montana and Vermont either enshrined abortion rights in their constitutions or rejected constitutional restrictions on the procedureAP