Supreme Court to hear pleas on marital rape in mid-October

The Supreme Court on Friday said it would list pleas on the issue of marital rape for hearing in midOctober The pleas raise the legal question of whether a husband enjoys immunity from prosecution for the offence of rape if he forces his wife who is not a minor to have sex A bench comprising Chief Justice DY Chandarchud and Justices JB Pardiwala and Manoj Misra took note of the submissions of lawyer Karuna Nundy that the pleas needed to be heardWe are in the midst of constitution bench hearings We can list this after the constitution bench matters are wrapped up the bench said and asked Solicitor General Tushar Mehta and other lawyers how much time they would take to advance their argumentsI will take two days This issue has social ramifications the law officer said A counsel for the petitioners said they would like to argue for three daysThen it can be listed for hearing in April next year the CJI quipped and later said the pleas would be listed for hearing in midOctoberEarlier senior advocate Indira Jaising had mentioned the plea for an urgent hearingThe constitutional validity of an exception clause of Section 375 rape of the Indian Penal Code IPC is under challenge as it exempts a husband from being prosecuted for rape for having nonconsensual sexual intercourse with the spouse if she happens to be an adultWe have to resolve the matters concerning marital rape the bench said The CJI had said these matters are to be heard by a threejudge bench and will be listed for hearing after the fivejudge constitution benches conclude hearing some listed casesOn January 16 the top court sought the Centres response to the petitions pertaining to the criminalisation of marital rape and the IPC provision on itThe Centre represented by Mehta had said the issue has legal as well as social implications and the government would like to file its response to the petitionsOne plea has been filed in relation to the Delhi High Courts split verdict of May 11 2022 on the issueJustices Rajiv Shakdher and C Hari Shankar had concurred on granting the petitioners a certificate of leave to appeal in the Supreme Court as the matter involved substantial questions of law which required a decision by the top courtHowever Justice Shakdher who headed the division bench favoured striking down the marital rape exception for being unconstitutional and said it would be tragic if a married womans call for justice is not heard even after 162 years since the enactment of the IPC Justice Shankar on the other hand said the exception under the rape law is not unconstitutional and was based on an intelligible differentia The concept of intelligible differentia distinguishes people or things grouped together from those that are left outAnother plea has been filed by a man against the Karnataka High Court verdict that paved the way for his prosecution for allegedly raping his wife The Karnataka High Court had on March 23 last year said exempting a husband from the allegations of rape and unnatural sex with his wife runs against Article 14 equality before law of the ConstitutionThis story has been sourced from a third party syndicated feed agencies Midday accepts no responsibility or liability for its dependability trustworthiness reliability and data of the text Midday managementmiddaycom reserves the sole right to alter delete or remove without notice the content in its absolute discretion for any reason whatsoever