Updated On: 20 July, 2021 05:48 PM IST | New Delhi | IANS
Senior advocate KV Viswanathan, the amicus curiae in the matter, submitted suspension (of election symbol in case of violations) can be time-bound and the idea is to evolve a deterrent

Supreme Court. File Pic
The Supreme Court has said its order should have been followed as it heard contempt petitions over non-compliance of its February 2020 directions for electoral candidates to disclose criminal antecedents through wide publication. The plea claimed these directions were not adhered during the Bihar Assembly election last year.
As counsel appearing for a political party tendered an unconditional apology, stating that this should not have happened and that there shouldn`t be criminalisation of politics, a bench of Justices RF Nariman and BR Gavai said, "We don`t buy this sorry; our orders have to be followed." Senior advocate Vikas Singh, representing the Election Commission, submitted that the Nationalist Congress Party fielded 26 candidates with criminal antecedents and the CPI-M had fielded four candidates with criminal antecedents.