Continued from page u0010 u000f THE civic bodyu2019s legal department has lodged a complaint against the flat owners of the u0006 u0005 - storeyed building for occupying their respective flats without the builderu2019s Occupation Certificate ( OC). Prarthana society, located opposite Parelu2019s ITC Grand Hotel, doesnu2019t have a water connection yet owing to the lack of OC despite each flat in the building costing over R u0006 crore. u201c I have not come across a case where such a large number of flat occupants from the same building have been issued arrest warrants by the court. Citizens have either ignored the summons or have taken the matter lightly, showing disrespect to the court, compelling it to take such stern action,u201d said solicitor Stuti Galiya. The complaint alleges that sub- engineer ( Building and Proposal department) V V Kamble inspected the premises of Prarthana Heights some years ago and it was observed that the Building Completion Certificate ( BCC) and OC were not granted to the building by the BMC as the developer or architect had not applied for it. But the building was occupied. Kamble prepared an inspection report including the names of all the unauthorised occupants. Executive engineer N M Hamand gave approval for issuing the notice under the Mumbai Municipal Corporation ( MMC) Act to the developer, architect and the occupants, on November . , . . . . . On December . . , . . . . , Kamble found that the accused had failed to comply with the notice. A second inspection report was put up for approval before the superiors and on December . . , . . . . , assistant engineer Y P . unnarkar issued a final letter to all the parties informing them of prosecution being initiated against them. u2018 Residents negligent toou2019 A resident of the building confirmed the news saying that the residents were asked to be present in court on . anuary . first. u201c After not appearing for the first hearing, they failed to show up at the second one, too, which is why the court issued arrest warrants against the absentees on February u0005 . The Bhoiwada police were also intimated,u201d he told mid- day. Those present before the court were released against a cash bail deposit of R . . , . . . each, he added. The absentees will bear the additional expenses towards the cancellation of the warrant and cash bail bond. u201c We are already paying hefty monthly maintenance [ between R . . , . . . to R . . , . . . a month]. We also have to rely on tanker water as BMC has not given us a water connection. We are hoping that the matter gets resolved at the earliest. Many residents have invested huge savings to buy flats here,u201d another owner said. Attempts made to contact the society lawyer, Kaustubh Gupte, did not yield any result. u201c We have lodged a complaint against the occupants for illegally occupying the flats without Occupation Certificates ( OC) being issued to the developer by the BP department. The accused were not present in the court even after summons were issued nor were represented by any lawyer,u201d said a civic official from the F/ S Ward. D R Kawale, assistant law officer, BMC, complainant in the case, refused to comment on the matter saying he was not authorised to speak to the media. u2018 Civic officials answerable, toou2019 Senior property lawyer Vinod Sampat said, u201c Thousands of buildings in Mumbai do not have Occupation Certificates ( OC) and the municipal authorities levy hefty amounts as additional property tax, water charges from such societies. Civic officials are hand- in- glove with the builders and the occupants have to suffer.u201d When such a complaint is filed, the matter is heard at Municipal Courts and action is initiated against builders, architects and occupants. But it is the u201c builders who misguide flat buyers to take possession of premises,u201d Sampat said. It is the responsibility of the builder to not allow occupation till OC is issued, he said, adding that no action is ever initiated against municipal officials for not taking action against faulty builders. u201c Why donu2019t they blacklist builders who have not obtained the OC?u201d Sampat questioned. u2018 Why are builders, civic o u001f cials never punished?u2019 Senior property lawyer blames civic body for OC goof- up; says it is hand- in- glove with builders u2018 We are already paying hefty monthly maintenance. We also have to rely on tanker waters as BMC has not given us a water connection. We are hoping that the matter gets resolved at the earliest. Many residents have invested huge savings to buy the propertyu2019 A flat owner at Prarthana Heights Prathana Heights, Parel. PIC/ SURESH KARKERA Timeline NOV 2, 2018 Notices under MMC Act issued to developer, architect and occupants DEC 14, 2018 BP department found accused had failed to comply with the notice and second inspection report prepared DEC 20, 2019 Assistant engineer issued final letter regarding prosecution to accused

u2018 Why are builders, civic o cials never punished?u2019

Trending Stories

Latest Photos

Latest Videos

Latest Web Stories

Mid-Day Fast

Home / Mumbai / Mumbai News / Article / u2018 Why are builders, civic o cials never punished?u2019

u2018 Why are builders, civic o cials never punished?u2019

Trending Stories

Latest Photos

Latest Videos

Latest Web Stories

Mid-Day Fast